The Protocols of the Elders of Zion - The Origin of a Lie Revealed

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion – The Origin of a Lie Revealed

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is an anti-Semitic hoax. It was fabricated using a number of previous sources, some of which were anti-Semitic. Its content is a combination of blatant anti-Semitism and unfounded myths. In reality, it is a fake text, and is therefore a fake.

The First Published Version Was Forged

The first published version of the Protocols was forged, and the author argues that this is the most believable source for this book. So how do you know what’s real? However, the text has been reprinted countless times, and the alleged authentic manuscripts are available for public viewing online. A recent article by David Dawson in the University of Washington Information School claims that this is the best source for the history of the Protocols. Shop for conspiracy shirts online.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion has a mixed history. The Protocols were forged in 1917, by a Jewish emigrant living in Tsarist Russia. Several versions cite sources ranging from a Russian emigre to a prominent Free Mason. Many scholars argue that it was written by a Jew who planned to enslave mankind and destroy Christianity.

Other Versions Have Been Republished

Other versions have been republished, with a few important changes. In 1906, Herman Bernstein published a variant text of The Protocols in the collection of the Czar. This edition was declared a forgery, but it was nevertheless widely circulated and went through three printings. These versions have now been proven to be genuine, and the conspiracy theory has begun. They have remained a popular conspiracy theory for years, and many Jews are convinced that they were a product of the Protocols.

The Protocols have been circulated in many countries. The United States was the first country to publish them, and it was translated into many other languages. The Protocols are now found in schools and libraries worldwide. A 139-page file of the Protocols was published by the FBI in France and English in 1907. Its popularity has continued to rise, and it was even translated into Spanish and German.

The Protocols were a popular anti-Semitic text in Britain before the Holocaust. It was first published in Russia in 1903 and was translated into numerous languages, including English. Initially, the document was believed to be a fake, but this subsequently changed in the twentieth century. The documents of the Protocols became widely circulated, and the Holocaust deniers used them to justify their actions.

It is worth mentioning that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a work of fiction. Its apocalyptic plot is a false document. It does not even exist. It is only a myth that has been disproven. It is a spoof article written by a fictitious journalist to bolster the author’s credibility.

Considered one of the Most Notorious Anti-Semitic Works

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion have a long history of being faked. It is considered one of the most notorious anti-Semitic works of modern times. Its users are mostly religious, but they have a common purpose. They claim to be documenting a Jewish conspiracy. And, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are a fake and have been banned in many countries.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are a book written by a secret police in Russia. The Protocols contain anti-Semitic themes. It supports the trope that the Jews seek world dominance. It makes the Jews of the world a threat. It has also been used as a political tool to target the Jews of the West. Its authors have a history of anti-Semitic activities.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion first appeared in 1903. They claim that Jews will control the world in the near future. While claiming to be a Jewish leader, the book contains centuries-old anti-Jewish tropes. It claims that the Protocols are a false document. Its author lied in order to spread hate and spread propaganda. The Protocols of the Elders of Zios were fraudulent and fabricated, but the author still managed to make them famous.

3D Printed Guns Finally A Reality

3D Printed Guns Finally A Reality

With the 3d printing industry on the rise, companies and hobbyists alike are unleashing the creativity within. We have seen innovations left and right that we never knew was even possible. Something we never thought we would see is the ability to make weapons from a printer, but that day came just two years ago and with it a lot of controversy and issues politically. Conspiracy Clothing Co. cover a brief history of 3d printed guns, the good, the bad and the ugly. As a side note lots of folks looking for 3d printers agree these to be useful.

The Government and Their Increased Gun Control

The world was first alerted that 3d printing guns was becoming a reality in the year 2012 when a company announced that it was going to release 3d printed gun plans; that company was Defense Distributed. This idea could change the world forever because no longer would we need to go to a store to buy a gun; we could print them in our own homes. AR-15s with 600 rounds and guns with 30 rounds (M16s) were also produced by Defense Distributed.

Because of recent events and the government wanting more control over weapons, the releasing of these guns plans were obviously a huge deal, and the government did not remain silent. In 2013, the United States Department of state ordered them to remove the designs and instructions from their website. The government really doesn’t like the idea of people printing guns on their home printer because of their wish of increased gun control.

There Were No Types of Laws Banning The Printing of 3d Guns

We’re surprised that there were no types of laws banning the printing of 3d guns before it happened, then again, do you really think the government thought someone would actually do that in the near future? It was all theoretical until Defense Distributed released gun plans… and then everything got real quick; everyone started asking questions and many thought what they did was wrong. A lot of people were worried that everyone would start printing guns like crazy, unregulated, and that could be bad for the safety of society.

The organization that was the most concerned was the Department Of Homeland Security as they thought everyone’s safety would be compromised as a result of advances in 3d printing. It is difficult to manage laws when people are doing things in their own home noiselessly, and Homeland Security knows it. Homeland Security was also concerned that the thousands of people who legally could not own a gun would now have more access than ever to the weapon of their choice. Even if giving away or selling 3d printing files for weapons is illegal, it will be hard to regulate them digitally as it is hard to regulate things like music, movies, video games and software files.

The files were downloaded thousands of time upon publication, and not just by residents of the Untied States, before Defense Distributed got around to removing them. While the gun laws in the US aren’t too strict yet, other countries are, and now those citizens have a means to do a lot of illegal things. Countries with high number of downloads include the UK, Germany, Spain and Brazil. Even though these files are down, they are still widely available on file sharing sites such as The Pirate Bay.

Some US legislators have proposed regulations on 3d printers so that they can’t be used to print guns. If we allow the banning of certain objects on 3d printers, this could really hurt the creativity of the enthusiasts in the 3d printing community, people would continue to print guns anyway, and it could even violate the right to freedom of speech.

We still can’t believe that early in the year 2012, the printing community was talking about the idea of 3d printed guns but everyone thought it was many years out. Little did everyone know, but Defense Distributed was miles and miles ahead of the game and getting ready for their big release. Nobody thought in just a couple of short years, thousands and thousands of people would be printing their own, untraceable plastic guns.

It is NOT illegitimate to print your own weapons at home as we have been reminded the spokeswoman for the Bureau of ATF. The issue is mostly that plastic guns can go through a metal detector without getting discovered. While it is not illegal to print your own gun, it IS however not legal to own a firearm that can’t be detected by metal detectors.

The Emerging Society of Anonymous 3d Printing Groups

Time to talk about the fun stuff now: the emerging society of anonymous 3d printing groups! Hundreds of people are continuing to work on the development of 3d gun printing files free download to share with the world, even though it is attracting negative attention. Most of the users in this community do not share their names as they don’t want a target to be on them. There’s an anonymous guide on the market titled 3D Printable Firearms that has a list of working guns, how well they work and the cost to purchase and create.

One plastic gun is called the Liberator that can only shoot one bullet and costs about $9.30 in plastic to print. While the Liberator only shoots one bullet, another gun in this guide is the Liberator Prepperbox that shoots 4 bullets instead and doesn’t even cost much more money. Another gun only costs $2.41 in in materials to produce, shoots a .22 bullet and is named the Reprringer. The Reprringer is based off the Derringer which is the firearm that ended the life of Abraham Lincoln; just a fun little fact for you.. In addition to the cost of materials of things like filament, some guns also need a screw or spring to function… what a deal breaker!

There are a lot of gun lobbyists that think the gun is quite laughable. It’s true that 3d printed guns are not yet as stable and durable as real guns as they are vulnerable to cracking, overheating, breaking, and other issues after just a few uses sometimes. Another group of folks that despite how cool the innovation of 3d printed guns is, think they are silly little toys for people who aren’t that serious about guns. Despire some of these drawbacks, you can’t deny the pros of 3d printed guns: they pass through metal detectors, look far differently from a traditional gun, are simple to print, and can still end a life if it comes down to it. In this paragraph alone there are a handful of benefits and drawbacks so it’s hard to come to a conclusion if printing guns is good or bad.

Some worry that hobbyists and kids will start printing guns. Many 3d printing companies have been interviewed to find out of they worry that their printers will be used for bad things (like kids printing guns). The majority of 3d printer companies decline the opportunity to comment and others (including MakerBot) express that they ban sharing 3d printer gun files on their web site. There is no way though that any 3d printing company could actually stop people from printing guns once they obtain the files.

If you’re the type of person that believes there should be no or little regulations on guns, then this is all pretty good news. It seems that it is becoming easier and easier to print your own weapons, the files are available if you really want them, and nobody will know if you own a 3d printed gun. For every person that is trying to regulate the 3d printing of guns, there are three more working hard to create gun files to share and equip others with.

A good thing to note though however is that printing guns is not nearly as simple as it sounds; you can’t just click the print button and a gun will pop out shortly after. Still it requires a substantial amount of mechanical expertise so the standard hobbyist or kid probably will not have the capacity to print their own gun without extensive knowledge and research. Printing a single-shot 3d gun can still take up 5 hours or more, even if you 110% know what you are doing. On the other hand, kids are more technically advanced than ever before and where there’s a will there’s a way.

What Does The Future For 3d Printing Look Like?

So, taking this all into consideration, what does the future for 3d printing look like? It really could go either way of more freedom with printing or higher control. It will be interesting to see if guns are more prevalent than ever, if government finds a way to crack down on the technology, or if it really won’t be a big deal. Although printers can now be purchased for as low as $300, the media may be blowing it out of proportion. I’m sure we’ll see the answer unfold over the next few years or so!

Without Our 2nd Amendment Rights…We Won’t Have Any Others

Without Our 2nd Amendment Rights…We Won’t Have Any Others

In church today a guy was sitting in front of me and he was wearing a t-shirt with the 2nd Amendment printed on the back: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The Conspiracy Clothing Co. has a variety of t-shirt designs you should definitely check out. 

I thought about it and came to the conclusion that it should be worded to convey the correct meaning … Because a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The Right to Bear Arms to Protect Our Free Society

With several mass shootings taking place over the past few years the gun-control (actually the gun-confiscation) crowd have gained momentum in their efforts to take away the right of private citizens to own weapons. Right now the AR15 is the scariest looking firearm to those hysterical freaks, so they are focusing on that weapon in particular, at least according to them. Then there’s the ‘high-capacity’ magazine … semi-auto and automatic weapons, detachable magazines, high-velocity, too powerful for hunting, not needed for personal protection lines of liberal rhetoric spewed along with the, “If it saves the life of one child, then banning them is worth it!”

I’m not going to get off into a rant about how many lives are saved by people who own guns. Or how many families have been spared unthinkable acts of violence because they had a gun in their homes when criminals broke in. Nor is there any point to arguing that the right to keep and bear arms isn’t about ‘hunting,’ or target shooting and shooting competitions. All that stuff is valid and very important but the most important point is that the right to keep and bear arms is to protect our free society, yes from a tyrannical government, not to mention personal protection from criminals … the cops can’t be everywhere.

Corrupt Elections Performed By The Government

We have witnessed via the election of President Trump, the exposing of the most corrupt and treasonous actions by people in our government and law-enforcement agencies probably in U.S. history. And it’s still going on right now. People in the FBI and Department of Justice have been working long before the election in 2016 to ensure that Hillary Clinton would win. People in the FBI re-worded James Comey’s exoneration statement of Hillary long before she or anyone was even interviewed to make sure the wording avoided anything that might be used in a criminal prosecution.

At the same time Bill Clinton met with Attorney General Loretta Lynch while the Justice Department was “investigating” Mrs. Clinton’s emails … the same guys doing the investigation that changed the wording of Comey’s statement. NSA spying on private U.S. citizens. The FBI and/or CIA putting an ‘informant’ into the Trump campaign without telling him about it. The constant phony “Russian collusion” investigation by Robert Mueller and his band of Democrat, Hillary supporting attorneys … bent on overthrowing the election and / or removing our duly, legitimately elected President.

Way too many things and way too involved to even scratch the surface in this humble blog post. I do know of a certainty that had Hillary Clinton won, we never would have found out about any of this utter treachery. And it would have kept going on unabated. Hillary would have had the unprecedented opportunity to sell out the country beyond her and Bill’s wildest dreams … far more than she did while being Secretary of State. The corruption at the highest levels of our government is beyond staggering and we don’t know but just a small part of it.

The people at the FBI making comments about how Trump supporters are “poor to middle-class, uneducated, p.o.s.” That going into a Wal-Mart the FBI agent could “smell” the Trump supporters before the election. This is what they think of us.

The Time to Protect Our 2nd Amendment Rights is Now

Now don’t take this as some “call to arms to fight against the tyranny of the government.” I am saying that if there ever was a time to protect our 2nd Amendment rights, it’s now. It is our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms … and that right cannot be infringed by anyone. I guess I can say that without the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, we won’t have any of the others rights. When we give up that one, we give them all up.